• Home
• Introduction
to MOC
• Functional
Structure
• Trade
Statistics
• Economic
Integration
• Cambodia's
Exporters
• Cambodia's Imports
• MOC
Links
• MOC
Contacts
•
Legal
• Licensing & Registration
• Activities
• Seminar
• Pro-Poor
Trade Sector Strategy
• Integrated Framework (IF)
• Speeches
• Trade Directory
•
IPR |
 |
CHAPTER
IV. CAPACITY BUILDING
A.
EXISTING SITUATION:
In Cambodia, increasing a few dozen
legally-trained personnel to the hundreds which the administration of a
country of eleven million inhabitants would require, will take years. A
major issue that must also be addressed is the fact that creating lawyers,
let alone legal scholars, is a lengthy undertaking. The statistics of the
judicial staff are particularly revealing: of the 120 or so judges who are
actively employed in Cambodia, barely a handful of them have any proper
legal qualifications. It will be years before the students now in law
schools have the competence to be magistrates and judges. It will take years
until justices now sitting in the Courts can be substituted by professionals
who will have been taught international trade, bankruptcy, privatization and
business law. Court justices have none or very little business law knowledge
because they are seldom exposed to these areas of the law.
There is a clear consensus on the need for emphasis on training. Whether it
is the training of judges and court officers in substantive or procedural
rules, or the training of parliamentarians and their assistants in the
intricacies of modern legislation and legislative techniques, or even the
training of lawyers, notaries and paralegal staff, the need for training
cannot be overemphasized. The retraining provided through continuing legal
education programs is essential to guarantee the very credibility of
government lawyers and judiciary.
B. PAST CAPACITY BUILDING ACTIVITIES
Considering the huge demand for training that currently exists, there has
been a proliferation of law courses offered for the benefit of both
prospective lawyers and officials. Apart from the Faculty of Laws of the
University of Phnom Penh, law courses are offered by the National Economics
and Finance Institute, the National Institute of Management (NIM) and the
LRU, the Ministry of Commerce, the University of San Francisco School of Law
among others.
Training of judges and court officers were organized by the Ministry of
Justice with an emphasis on civil and criminal procedures. A limited number
of judges were sent to France for further judicial training for twenty
months. The University of San Francisco School of Law conducted some
training seminars for judges using materials translated into Khmer. The U.N.
High Commissioner for Human Rights Office in Cambodia manages a judicial
mentor initiative that places international advisers in a handful of courts.
USAID supported a court training project from 1994-1997 that provided
training and mentors to selected courts. Other ad hoc training for judges
has also been organized. The effort to train judges remains sparse compared
to both the needs and the necessity of increasing the capacity of judges.
Except for generous assistance during the post-inauguration of the Bar,
education and training program for lawyers and prospective new members have
been scanty and superficial.
The quality of such courses has been uneven at best, and the benefits
questionable. In general training workshops were offered to government
lawyers along with legal technical assistance, dealing with the substantive
aspects of the law being drafted. Mostly these training efforts failed to
address other critical issues such as training methodology, and legislative
drafting skills.
C.
CAPACITY BUILDING FOR THE BAR IN AN ERA OF GLOBALIZATION
In Cambodia, it is the Bar rather than
the Supreme Court which regulates the legal profession. Only in the event of
conflict, can the parties turn to the courts for resolution. Neither the
Ministry of Justice nor any other government agency may influence the
composition of the Bar Council. Established by law in 1995 the Bar boasts to
have over 200 lawyer-members. Government lawyers, judges and
prosecutors are not permitted to join. Recently the Bar has shown increasing
involvement in law reform. It publicly comments on legal reform issues or
current events with legal significance and provided input into the drafting
of the land law, criminal and civil codes, the Khmer Rouge law, to name just
a few. Despite these worthy efforts and intention, the Bar suffers from a
severe lack of physical and intellectual resources. It is unable to provide
any continuing legal education to its members or to offer legal education to
the public. More troublesome it was not able to accommodate the clinical
trainings for law graduates which are prerequisites for them becoming full
fledge lawyers. According to the Law on Bar Statutes, the Center for
Training of Legal Profession is to be the starting point of a career as a
lawyer. The Law states that law graduates must take an exam to gain
admission into the Center. However, the Center has not yet been established.
Notwithstanding the current restrictions
placed on foreigners practicing law in Cambodia, there are still quite a
number of foreigners working in the legal field in Cambodia. However, rather
than being labeled as lawyers, they usually work under the guise of
"consultants". In any case the vast majority of them are involved
in advising in relation to overseas legislation rather than Cambodian laws.
These foreign practitioners are seen by some as a threat to Cambodian
lawyers, however, in the opinion of many others, these foreign professionals
are providing a valuable service, especially when considered from a
multi‑jurisdictional perspective which is the way the legal practice,
at least the international commercial practices, seems to be heading in
Cambodia. Not only are they providing a service to clients but also they are
imparting knowledge and understanding of foreign laws to their Cambodian
colleagues who benefit greatly therefrom.
It is also worth noting that Cambodia is
currently negotiating its entry to the World Trade Organization. As such
Cambodia has to liberalize its trade and business practices as urged by WTO.
In this regard, the legal market should see further expansion in terms of
the opening of new law firms and an increase in the size of some already
well established firms.
Traditionally, the Bar Association, which is responsible for the training,
supervision and professionalization of a new generation of Cambodia lawyers,
has played a crucial role in the promotion and protection of human rights
and establishment of the rule of law in Cambodia. As international business
and investment from abroad have to rely on the services provided by the
government and private sector in the host country, the Bar has to rethink
its role in terms of equipping the Cambodian lawyers with the necessary
skills to cope with the multijurisdictional practice inherent in
international business.
Notwithstanding the significant role that
could be placed on Cambodian lawyers, there are major barriers presented to
the full integration of Cambodian lawyers in representing international and
multinational clients. Cambodia uses civil law the significance of which is
focussed on legal provisions and the Cambodian legal education. As such
Cambodian law students are limited in the scope of their education to such
tenets. This is an impediment when needing to assist on multijurisdictional
assignments once they become lawyers. A good perspective of common law
principles can prove invaluable when explaining the legal environment to
clients from common law jurisdictions.
Compounding the matter of attaining a greater perspective of international
legal practice is that very few Cambodian law graduates have the means to be
able to further their legal education overseas. Such international exposure
very often goes towards the development of a well-developed
multi-jurisdictional practitioner.
A further hindrance to Cambodian lawyers working in the international legal
arena is that it is generally accepted that most Cambodian law students are
not good at English because of the education system and they are at a
disadvantage when compared to those born in English speaking countries.
D.
VISION
OF THE FUTURE
There
is a clear need to consolidate these different initiatives and strengthen
them, whilst streamlining the use of limited resources available for
training. While there can be no question about the need for emphasis on
training, there are still a couple of fundamental questions pertaining to
both the purpose and modalities of the required legal training, which have
yet to be addressed. The first question relates to the form of the proposed
school or facility required to provide legal training; the second is about
its location. Of less controversy are the issues of law curriculum, course
content, course format, and training materials.
a. Form of School or Facility:
Not surprisingly, having regard to the dualistic system of laws, which
Cambodia has inherited, there has been considerable debate about the form of
the school or facility required to provide legal training. While some have
advocated the creation of a special school dedicated to the training of
magistrates, not unlike the French school for magistrates, others - perhaps
a majority - would prefer a less specialized school which would cater for
the entire legal profession, with special modules, if need be, to address
the specific needs of particular branches of the profession. Whatever be the
final outcome of this particular debate, it is best to avoid a situation
where limited resources available for training are applied in pursuit of a
disparate set of training initiatives, thus foregoing the efficiency gains
likely to accrue from a closely coordinated and comprehensive legal training
initiative.
b.
Location of School:
Similarly, questions have also been raised about the location of the
proposed school or facility. While some advocate the enlargement of the
existing school of administration to include a law school, others favor the
creation of an entirely new and independent school of law, and one, which
would not be subject to the control or authority of any particular ministry
or department. The latter would seem more appropriate in terms of striking a
compromise between 4 independent institutions such as the Executive, the
Legislative, the Judiciary, and the Bar. A governing body or board of
trustees could be set up to accommodate all the stakeholders in the
management and supervision of a prospective legal training school or
facility.
c.
Law school curricular and teaching methods:
Future civil servants
including government lawyers need a legal education where the curriculum
incorporates the concepts of the legal framework of a free market economy.
But until these future cadres are fully educated, those who are now in
charge must be re-trained. It is therefore necessary, when assessing legal
technical assistance requirements, to focus simultaneously on both basic
legal education and continuing legal education. It is equally critical, when
designing curricula for either education to address substantive law as well
as legal skills aspects. Government lawyers must not only learn the new
legislative context of their country, as it is being developed, but also
acquire basic legal skills which they were never taught.
d. Course content:
With
respect to the substantive law content of the retraining programs, it is
likely that all stakeholders will need to be familiar with economic,
financial, commercial and environmental laws and other legal issues
associated with restructuring State-owned enterprises, privatization or BOT
(Build-Own-Transfer) projects. Other specialized areas such as bankruptcy
and insolvency related work and intellectual property protection, and labor
laws merit special focus.
e.
Course Format:
It
is equally important to give attention to the format and methodology of the
training as it is to focus on content. It is accordingly crucial to adapt
the format and methodology to the needs of the audience concerned. As
is now well established, the quality of legal education - and eventually of
the legal profession - is to a large extent dependent on the teaching
methodology.
With
the advent of complicated disputes, involving for example international
financing, judges are expected to adjudicate issues difficult to condense
into the limited time which 'training workshops' usually allow. In the
complex field of modern economic, financial, commercial and environmental
laws, it becomes harder and harder to provide expert opinion and advice
without an in-depth mastery of the subject matters. For law practitioners,
there is greater pressure to specialize unlike in the past where they tended
to be generalists.
For this reason, strong
preference is now given to multi-year programs like a
specialized 2-year LL.M. course in partnership with a foreign learning
institution for the benefit of law graduates or those professionals meeting
the course prerequisites.
Other approaches could include
scholarships aimed at building a core of qualified younger legal staff with
good foreign language skills and the ability to spend a significant time
abroad. Internships with foreign law firms should be offered to younger to
mid-level staff. Study tours, seminars and workshops, on the other
hand, could serve to enhance already existing legal skills of older, more
experienced staff who may not have superior foreign language skills and may
not be able to stay away from their jobs for an extended period of time.
f.
Skill Training:
Substantive law retraining
is the most visible aspect of the retraining requirements but skills
training is equally important and to ignore this component would jeopardise
the results of all retraining efforts. A new role for lawyers warrants new
functions which require new skills and techniques. Trainers must thus not
only explain and demonstrate the role and interaction of laws in the economy
but also teach drafting. Legislative drafting is of utmost importance but is
not limited to drafting laws. Implementation decrees must also be prepare by
government lawyers. The same lawyers must also be equipped to draft and
review contracts ant other legal documents relevant to transactions made by
the State.
Similarly, continuing legal
education in Cambodia must include litigation and advocacy skills. As the
country embarks on ambitious policies calling for major roles to be played
by foreign investors and involving international joint venture agreements,
the number of disputes has risen dramatically, requiring new skills which
the judiciary needed to master. The challenge to the trainer is to design
curricula which permit judges and other officials involved in the settling
of disputes to understand the mechanics of the transaction involve as well
as to apply the law which governs each transaction. Until now, Cambodian
judges seldom considered economic law issues having mostly been confronted
with criminal law cases.
g.
Training materials:
The lack of current
training materials published in the Khmer language is the rule rather than
the exception in Cambodia. Few judges and lawyers have
good knowledge of English. In general, their limited language skills
presents a barrier to participation in international seminars and workshops.
Translation
of foreign materials is sometimes provided but seldom meets the specific
needs of the local constituency. Therefore, they are
usually limited to legal materials available in Khmer such as regulations or
guidelines from the Ministry of Justice or other Cambodian laws. It
then becomes imperative to produce locally tailor-made training materials,
manuals and handbooks integrating the domestic laws and the international
laws and practice into the local context.
Resource should be mobilized to put in place a basic library and
information centre on economic, financial, commercial, intellectual
property, environmental, and international laws, including a computerized
index of comparative law materials and of existing Cambodian laws and
regulations affecting business, including video tape collection of
law-oriented information and teaching materials.
CHAPTER V:
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE STRATEGY
A.
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROGRAM
Notwithstanding a number of outstanding issues still to be addressed,
as well as some areas of divergence in the approach to legal and judicial
reform, there is a large measure of consensus both on the ultimate
objectives of a legal and judicial reform program and on the eventual
elements of such a program. But a consensus on objectives and elements alone
is not enough to guarantee the success of such a program. Two other factors
are key to its success. They are: the adoption and implementation of an
adequate legal and judicial reform strategy, and the existence of
appropriate institutional arrangements for its implementation.
a.
Institutional Arrangements:
The other main challenge lies in the institutional arrangements which
are put in place to supervise the implementation of any future legal and
judicial reform program. Under the Technical Assistance Project, the
Government issued an Anukret, dated August 15, 1997, establishing the Legal
Reform Unit (LRU) to be responsible for legal reform in general and the
provision of training and assistance in the preparation of legislation. In
this capacity, LRU has been responsible for supervision of the legal
diagnostic study as well as the first draft of the legal and judicial reform
strategy paper which is currently under preparation. Following the workshop
held in April 2000 to review the results of the legal diagnostic study, a
steering committee was also established by the Government to follow-up on
the results of the workshop and assist in the development of the proposed
legal and judicial reform strategy. Although in the past the steering
committee has not been actively engaged in this process, its recent
willingness to take over the process of finalizing the strategy can be
viewed as a commitment to own the process and to assert its new role as
the "maitre d'oeuvre" and the "maitre d'ouvrage" of the
legal and judicial reform. Such a commitment should be commended and further
encouraged.
In accordance with the Anukret on the organization and functioning of
the Ministry of Justice, dated January 20, 2000, the Ministry of Justice is
responsible for all matters pertaining to the administration of justice and
the training of judges. More recently, the Government has issued an Anukret
establishing a Judicial Reform Council or Conseil de Reforme de la
Justice (CRJ) to be responsible for the design and supervision of
judicial reform. CRJ consists of seven members, including the President of
the Supreme Court and the Minister of Justice who are its President and Vice
President, respectively, as well as the President of the Court of Appeal and
representatives of the CSM and the Council of Jurists. There have been
complaints that, as presently constituted, the composition of the CRJ is too
restrictive to allow it to achieve its objectives.
Bearing in mind that institutional arrangements are key to the
success of any future legal and judicial reform program, it is necessary for
the Government to ensure that any such arrangements are fully consistent
with the needs and objectives of the program. Whilst the LRU may have been
the appropriate agency in the past to undertake the implementation of a
program whose primary focus was legal reform, the same is not true of a
program which is not limited to the executive branch but is likely to be
extended to cover both the judicial and legislative branches as well. Any
suggestion that a reform program covering the judicial or legislative
branch, or both, is to be managed under the exclusive control or authority
of a body which reports to the executive is not likely to be well received
by either of these other two branches. Similarly, as presently constituted,
CRJ lacks the width of purpose and composition to undertake any legal reform
initiatives which go beyond the broad confines and competence of the judiciary.
b.
Suggested Alternatives:
In terms of institutional arrangements there are two alternatives for
the Government to consider. The first alternative involves the creation of a
brand new council or committee to be responsible for legal and judicial
reform, comprised of representatives of each of the branches of government
which have a direct and immediate interest in legal and judicial reform.
Whilst the proposal has the merit of ensuring adequate representation of
each of the branches of government involved, it has the disadvantage that it
involves the creation of yet another new entity likely to duplicate the role
and responsibilities of one or more entities already in existence. The other
alternative presupposes that the composition of the CRJ is likely to be
expanded, as has been suggested, to be representative of civil society in
general. A duly mandated and expanded Council for Legal and Judicial Reform
would be a strong candidate to be responsible for the supervision of a
future legal and judicial reform program in Cambodia.
ANNEX I. NATIONAL LEGISLATIVE
PROGRAMME
1. LAWS THAT IMPROVE JUDICIARY AND LAW MAKING
Amendment
of the Law on the Organization and Functioning of the Supreme Council of
Magistracy
At
present, there is little effective separation between the Executive,
Legislative, and Judicial branches of government in Cambodia. It is
important to begin building a court system that is professional,
nonpolitical, and independent. This is a long-term process which would
undoubtedly encounter political resistance from certain sides but is
necessary if a consensus develops that economic growth and investment
require such an action. One powerful reform that would signal the
Government's commitment to judicial reform would be the amendment of the Law
on the Organization and Functioning of the Supreme Council of Magistracy.
The Supreme Council of Magistracy (SCM) needs to be de-politicized
and, as the guarantor of the Judiciary's independence, completely separate
from the Executive and Legislative branches.
Independent
Budget for the SCM and the Judiciary (Financial Management Law)
Financial autonomy of the judiciary is
essential for the independence of the courts. As much as the Legislative
Branch has its own separate budget so should be the Judiciary. The annual
national budget as adopted in the Financial Management Law should include a
separate budget line for the SCM and the Judiciary distinct from the
Ministry of Justice's budget.
Law
on Magistrates and Law Officers
The
Ministry of Justice has taken the lead in drafting a number of key laws
related to judicial reform. One important example is the drafting of a Law
on Magistrates which has already received the approval of the SCM. The
present draft includes provisions on qualifications and ranks of judges.
The
Ministry of Justice is also drafting a Law on Court Clerks to clarify their
role in the judicial process.
Civil
Code and
Civil Procedure Code
There
is no civil code currently in force, and it will be several years before the
current draft is completed by the large team of Japanese consultants
responsible for its preparation, and probably several more before it is
eventually adopted. Meanwhile there are large gaps in the law, including the
law relating to succession, which have become a source of extreme
embarrassment for judges and magistrates.
The
Criminal Code and the Law on Criminal Procedures
The
Ministry of Justice has completed the draft Criminal Code, and drafting
continues on the Law on Criminal Procedures with the assistance from France.
The drafting of the Law of Evidence has yet to be initiated. These core
legislation represents an essential reform for the court system which
currently operates without well-defined or well-respected
pretrial, trial, and sentencing rules and procedures, most of which derive
from Cambodia's previous socialist legal system. The enactment of these
drafts, a monumental challenge in itself, will remove the ambiguities and
inconsistencies as found in the current two criminal laws, namely the 1993
Law on Criminal Procedures of the State of Cambodia, and the 1993 UNTAC
Provisions on Criminal Law. Moreover, they will provide the backbone for the
fair and just adjudication of the criminal process.
Law
Establishing Specialized Courts
In
addition, the Ministry of Justice is collaborating with the relevant
ministries to draft a law to establish specialized courts such as
commercial, labor or administrative courts. Specialized courts are common in
countries following civil law and common law traditions. Lawyers and
observers voice support for this reform. Creating specialized courts would
allow intensive training to target small groups of judges in defined topic,
enabling capacity building within the Judiciary to move more quickly and
efficiently.
(a) Commercial Court:
Historical
experience suggests that the availability of effective and low cost dispute
settlement is an important condition for expanding markets, for meeting the
increasing complexity of economic development, and thus for economic
development itself. While sweeping judicial reform is a lengthy task, the
Government could proceed in the meantime with an alternative method of
reform such as creating a commercial court. This would coincide with its
enactment of a series of commercial legislation such commercial arbitration
law, companies law, bankruptcy law, and intellectual property laws. Establishing a commercial court would enable the Government to
develop an institution with clear jurisdictions, set procedures, adequate
resources, and better-trained judges with less patience for a corrupt
court system. The commercial court model could provide momentum for judicial
reform.
(b) Labor Court:
The
Cambodian Labor Law provide for the establishment of labour courts that will
have jurisdiction over individual disputes occurring between workers and
employers regarding the execution of the labour contract or the
apprenticeship contract, and to determine the magnitude of labor related
offenses. At present Cambodia does not have a Labor Court although the topic
is under serious consideration among the Government circle. In the meantime,
labor disputes are handled by the common law courts of the first instance
such as the Municipality Court of Phnom Penh. The need for labour courts as
a distinct jurisdiction from the common court system is due to: the
different nature of the conflict; the different composition of the tribunal;
and the different procedure involved.
The
conflicts arising between employers and workers or their respective
organizations have to be situated and resolved in a different context than
the ones emerging in a common contract relationship. Except where the
dispute concerns a breach of employment contract, workers and employers will
have to continue to work together long after the dispute arose and was
settled. The role of the judge in a labour court becomes different from the
role of a judge in common law, and the judge becomes a promoter of social
peace and justice. This will generally call for decisions taking into
account the interests of both parties (and finding a balance between their
different interests), rather than declaring one of the parties right and the
other one wrong. Decisions taken in these kinds of disputes can have far
reaching consequences on the individual, family and social life in most
cases of the worker. For this reason, a specialized judicial system with
experienced judges in labour and related matters is necessary.
(c) Administrative Court:
/////// to be completed //////
Amendment
of the Internal Rules of National Assembly
The
success of this ambitious legislative reform program lies to a certain
extent on the ability of the National Assembly and the Senate to review and
enact draft legislation in an efficient and expedient manner. The lack of
the necessary legal and analytical skills of parliamentarians to grasp the
intricacies of modern legislation will not only result in delays in the
lawmaking process but can also affect the substantive and qualitative
contents of the legislation enacted.
Revisions
should be made to the Internal Rules to shift the Assembly's role in the
legislative process from a reactive role to a proactive one. Provisions on
continuous consultations amongst the various branches and agencies need to
be emphasized. Streamlined review and debate procedures on lengthy
legislation should be considered without sacrificing their quality.
2. LEGISLATION TO SUPPORT PRIVATE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT
One
essential prerequisite for private sector growth is a sound legal framework.
The private sector mobilizes human, physical, financial, and technical
resources to make profits and accumulate wealth. Businesses need rules that
guarantee property rights, regulate anticompetitive conduct, resolve
commercial disputes, and limit State interference. The experiences of many
developing countries suggest that the absence or inadequacy of laws and
their enforcement discourages and distorts trade and investment, raises
transaction costs and risk, fosters corruption, and generally hinders
private sector development.
COMMERCIAL CODE
The
MoC has completed drafts of a new Law on Business Enterprises (to serve as a
new company law), commercial contract law, law on commercial arbitration,
secured transaction law, and bankruptcy law. The IMF has listed the
submission of several commercial laws to the National Assembly as one of its
structural benchmarks for the new Enhanced Structural Adjustment Facility (ESAF)
loan to Cambodia.
Law
of Business Enterprises
The
overall framework for commercial transactions and contractual relations,
essential to the effective functioning of a market system, has yet to be
addressed comprehensively in Cambodia. The corporate form, as we know it
today, has several important characteristics. It endows a firm with
independent legal personality so that it can act, sue, and be sued under its
own name. It provides investors with limited liability and thereby enables
companies to raise capital from a pool of investors. Lastly, it defines the
rights and responsibilities of the key participants in the firm, including
its owners, managers, and creditors. These features have made the corporate
form an important vehicle for the process of capital formation in Western
economic development.
The draft Law of Commercial Enterprises
which has been submitted to the Council of Ministers provides for the creation of four types of legal persons, namely general
partnership, limited partnership, private limited company and public limited
company. The provisions regulating general and limited partnerships
are from romano-germanic origin. Hence, in this area, the draft law is in
harmony with the civil law tradition of the Kingdom of Cambodia. The
provisions regulating both private and public limited companies are from
anglo-saxon origin. The choice of the anglo-saxon concept of
company instead of the French “société
par actions” is easily justifiable when comparing the legal mechanisms
involved in the creation of this type of legal person. The anglo-saxon law of company is easier to apply as well as to
administer. With the recent announcement of Prime Minister Hun Sen
concerning the creation of a stock market, specific provisions dealing with
transfer of securities to, and protection of, the public were added.
Law of Commercial Contracts
Most relevant for the commercial legal
framework are commercial contracts, defined as written agreements related to
production, exchange of goods, provision of services, or other business. The
draft Law of Commercial Contracts is designed to cover "pure"
commercial contracts and where both parties are enterprises such as
disposition of good will, distribution and franchising, joint venture,
commercial leasing, commercial sale, brokerage, carriage and deposit. Contracts where one of the parties is not an enterprise, or
"mixed contracts" such as consumer sales contracts, contracts of
employment and residential leases, are outside of the scope of the law and
will be covered by the Civil Code. As
note earlier, the draft law contains a part dealing with general rules
applicable to all contracts. It is
the position of the Ministries of Commerce and Justice that for the time
being, these provisions should remain in the law. When the Civil Code is adopted, this part of the law will be repealed
so that there is no duplication of the general contract provisions.
Commercial Arbitration Law (and
Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards)
|